Are you from India? 🇮🇳
👉 Check Today's Deals on Amazon IndiaDelhi High Court Upholds Pawan Kalyan’s Personality Rights
Deputy CM Pawan Kalyan’s personality rights have been protected by the Delhi High Court against unauthorized use.
Deputy Chief Minister K. Pawan Kalyan has successfully petitioned the Delhi High Court for protection of his personality rights. The court has affirmed that his celebrity status grants him ownership of his image and personal features. Unauthorized use of these attributes is in violation of established laws, according to court findings.
List of Defendants
Among the defendants in this case are major corporations including:
- Flipkart Internet Pvt. Ltd.
- Amazon Seller Services Pvt. Ltd.
- Meesho Ltd.
- Google LLC
- Meta Platforms Inc.
- Additional unnamed individuals or entities unlawfully exploiting Kalyan’s rights.
Details of Misuse
According to reports by The Hindu, the judge’s interim order reveals that several defendants have profited by using Mr. Kalyan’s name, face, voice, and image for commercial purposes. This includes using his personal features in AI models on their platforms and selling products without obtaining his consent.
Upcoming Hearing Dates
The court has scheduled additional hearings on:
- February 9, 2026 (before the Joint Registrar Judicial)
- May 12, 2026 (before the court itself)
The plaintiff is required to submit any additional documents by January 22, 2026, in accordance with the Commercial Courts Act, 2015, and the Delhi High Court (Original Side) Rules, 2018.
Relief for Affected Parties
The court permits parties harmed by this order, who are not primary violators, to petition for relief. These parties must commit to refraining from disseminating unlawful content detrimental to the plaintiff’s personality rights. The court may adjust the injunction based on individual case circumstances.
Disclaimer: This report is based on ongoing legal proceedings and reflects allegations made by the involved parties, which have yet to be substantiated in court. A final verdict remains pending. The publication does not assert the truth of the allegations.
Source link
