Kerala Assault Survivor Breaks Silence After Eight-Year Legal Battle

Survivor’s Disappointment with Justice System

A Kerala assault survivor has spoken out for the first time after enduring an eight-year legal struggle. She expressed her disillusionment with the justice system, questioning whether equality under the law truly exists. While six accused have been convicted, the survivor highlighted crucial issues during the trial, such as evidence tampering and rejected requests to change the judge, which contributed to her loss of faith in the judicial process.

Emotional Reflections on Social Media

Following the verdict in her case, the actress shared poignant reflections on social media. Despite the long journey filled with pain, she indicated that she has no regrets about the outcome. She candidly admitted her disillusionment with the court, stating, "Not everyone is equal before the law in this country." This statement emphasizes her deep disappointment regarding the protection of her fundamental rights.

Actress Reflects on Convictions and Rejects False Narratives

In her heartfelt post, the actress mentioned, “8 years, 9 months, 23 days… At the end of this journey of immense pain and heartache, I see a small ray of light. Six of the accused have been convicted.” She dedicated this verdict to those who dismissed her case and labeled her a liar. Additionally, she firmly denied false information claiming that the first accused was her personal driver, clarifying, “He is neither my driver nor my employee.”

South Actress Flags Suspicious Turns in Trial Process

Although the verdict may dishearten many, the actress was not surprised. She has observed suspicious changes in the case’s handling since late 2020. Particularly concerning was the way the prosecution approached the main accused. Despite her attempts to seek justice through the High Court and the Supreme Court, her requests for a judge change were denied, further eroding her confidence in the system.

A Survivor’s Final Word

The actress revealed that crucial evidence—the memory card in her case—had been illegally accessed three times while in court custody. Despite filing requests for a thorough investigation, she felt that these appeals were ignored. Notably, two government prosecutors appointed to the case resigned, citing a hostile court environment. They advised her privately, "Don’t expect justice from this court." Despite these setbacks, she remains hopeful for a judicial system that embodies true justice, stating her wish for a trial conducted publicly, in front of the media and the public.

Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and is based on reported news of court proceedings and legal claims. It does not constitute legal advice or a definitive statement on the outcome of the case. Readers should not rely solely on this information for making legal or commercial decisions.